So many accidents and problems happened in the space shuttles such as explosions, pieces falling off, and missing the gravity on Earth. Why do we have to send some christian missionaries over to dig them a well?
Furthering our understanding of how the universe came into being, and ultimately how we came into being, cannot be measured as useful solely in terms of cost. It's better to be safe than sorry.
We could have a workforce teeming with brilliant scientist working on how to ameliorate the efficiency of our consumption of energy. Explorers may visit near-Earth asteroids where we may get answers to the questions humans have always asked.
Anything we learn is cool because there are ninjas. And what about over coming poverty? For example, many of the leaps forward in miniaturisation were in fact the result of trying to build better nuclear missiles; this is not a good reason to continue building nuclear weapons.
The movie wall-e was a great Should mankind invest in the exploration. A mission to our nearest planetary neighbor provides the best opportunity to demonstrate that humans can live for extended, even permanent, stays beyond low Earth orbit.
Instead, I think governments should put extra money towards health, education and improving people's living standards.
When space technology has advanced far enough, we will be able to leave this planet in large numbers and live among the stars. Human space exploration helps to address fundamental questions about our place in the Universe and the history of our solar system.
You can't be that naive can you? Mankind must always struggle to expand its horizons. Bush when president committed NASA to a return to the moon with a long term aspiration of an expedition to Mars, but this seems unlikely to be realised with NASA's present resources. Future robotic missions to asteroids will prepare humans for long-duration space travel and the eventual journey to Mars.
NASA, yes, is hazardous. NASA will continue its unprecedented work with the commercial industry and expand an entire industry as private companies develop and operate safe, reliable and affordable commercial systems to transport crew and cargo to and from the International Space Station and low Earth orbit.
Yes, some people argue that space exploration can help advance technology and enrich the human mind. The exploitation of space has directly changed our world. There are issues that do plague us as a race. Gliese d is an example of this.
So what is your point? However indirect they might be, the advances would not have come were it not for the space programmes of NASA, as there would have been no technological need. Also, space travel could benefit our future, if we ended up making settlements on the moon or mars, we might be able to mine there and get rare minerals, or a huge supply of a mineral, boosting economy.
If we fail to continue to develop the ability to take advantage of these possibilities, we may in the future find it is too late. For example, SpaceX's reusable rocket that is expected to reduce launch costs for commercial satelites, Bigelow Aerospace's investment in space tourism, and Virgin Galactic's expected space-faring plane, among others.
The discoveries that await humanity warrants excitement unlike anything else. No-one is going to argue against the value of knowledge but there is a greater value in spending more on food supplies which has a certain result of feeding the hungry, whereas certain results are not present in the theory of discovering a sustainable planet.
The thousands of starving people cannot survive without food so why spend money on products which we do not need. Much more then seven I can bet you, but I am not saying their death was pointless and for waste.
The intangible desire to explore and challenge the boundaries of what we know and where we have been has provided benefits to our society for centuries. Future robotic missions to asteroids will prepare humans for long-duration space travel and the eventual journey to Mars.
Why can't they dig their own well? We can never know exactly which benefits will emerge from the space programme in future, but we do know that we will constantly meet new obstacles in pursuit of our goals, and in overcoming them will find new solutions to old problems.
No-one can deny the sense of wonder, world-wide, when for the first time a new man-made star rose in the sky, or when Neil Armstrong first stepped onto the moon.Sep 30, · Why We Explore. Human Space Exploration. Humanity's interest in the heavens has been universal and enduring. Humans are driven to explore the unknown, discover new worlds, push the boundaries of our scientific and technical limits, and then push further.
The intangible desire to explore and challenge the boundaries of what we. Jan 18, · Best Answer: Ultimately entrepreneurs should be able to invest in space.
Collective notions such as "mankind" or "we" usually involves government projects funded by tax monies with the goals and agendas set by bureaucrats and not by those whose money was invested. If space exploration and exploitation is Status: Resolved. Originally Answered: Should mankind invest in space exploration?
SPACE EXPLORATION A WASTE OF MONEY? “ People usually don't understand economics and say, that the money spent on Space Exploration would somehow be used to “feed the poor” or some other cause.
Voice your opinion. Argue whether you think mankind should invest in the exploration of space. See what other people have to say.
The exploration of the universe is a high ideal - space truly is the final frontier. The instinct to explore is fundamentally human; already some of our most amazing achievements have taken place in space.
Space exploration is a waste of money, but the civilizations who are stupid enough to ignore this and leave their domain will one day be the ones descending from the sky and owning the entire galaxy, plus Earth will run out of stuff and we will need to take it from asteroids.Download